Food inflation in the United States has skyrocketed, with prices increasing by 25.8% compared to the 3.9% inflation rate seen during the 2020 presidential election cycle. As the 2024 election nears, this significant increase in the cost of groceries has become a major issue for voters.
Donald Trump, the former president and current Republican candidate, has attributed the surge in food prices to the Democratic Party, focusing specifically on his opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris.
Trump's campaign ads blame Harris for her role in passing the 2021 American Rescue Plan, a $1.9 trillion relief measure designed to mitigate the effects of the pandemic. Trump suggests that this legislation contributed to the country’s inflation woes.
Causes of inflation: More than just one factor
While Trump’s campaign has targeted Harris and the Democrats for the inflation issue, economists have pointed to several other contributing factors. These include pandemic-induced supply chain disruptions, the conflict in Ukraine which led to increased oil prices, and corporate price gouging.
Inflation in the U.S. peaked at a 40-year high in 2022, with prices rising 9.1% over the previous year. The American Rescue Plan may have played a part, but it is not seen as the sole cause of the inflation crisis.
Political responses and economic strategies
The Federal Reserve has taken steps to manage inflation by raising interest rates 11 times between March 2022 and July 2023. The rate hikes, which increased interest from near 0% to between 5.25% and 5.5%, were designed to cool inflation, though they also raised fears of triggering a recession.
As the election draws closer, the Federal Reserve has decided to lower interest rates by 0.5%. This reduction aims to encourage businesses to borrow for expansion but is unlikely to solve the larger issue of rising consumer costs, especially as corporate price gouging remains a significant problem.
Corporate profits under scrutiny
Senator Sherrod Brown, chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, has been vocal about the role corporate profiteering plays in the ongoing inflation crisis. He has criticised companies for boosting profits at a time when families are struggling with rising costs.
Brown pointed to a Kansas City Fed study, which found that corporate profits accounted for half of the price increases in 2021. According to Brown, the rise in corporate profits and consumer prices is not a coincidence.
Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate, has also addressed the issue of corporate price gouging, calling for new penalties on companies that exploit crises to increase their profits. Harris proposes a policy solution that would crack down on opportunistic businesses.
However, some economists, including Jason Furman from the Obama administration, disagree. Furman argues that regulating corporate prices could backfire by stifling competition, ultimately keeping prices high for consumers.
Blockchain offers a potential fix
As policymakers debate solutions to corporate price gouging, blockchain technology has emerged as a potential answer. Dan Weinberger, CEO of Morpheus, a supply chain platform built on the Ethereum blockchain, believes that improving supply chain efficiency through blockchain could help lower costs for retailers while maintaining profit margins.
Weinberger explains that blockchain’s transparency can offer corporations greater visibility into their supply chains, enabling them to optimise purchases, reduce inefficiencies, and select the best suppliers. This, he argues, could result in more controlled consumer prices without the need for punitive legislation.
The role of blockchain in reducing costs has gained attention, but its adoption will depend on the willingness of the next U.S. president to embrace such technologies.
Trump’s stance on cryptocurrency
As part of his campaign, Donald Trump has positioned himself as a supporter of Bitcoin, appealing to cryptocurrency enthusiasts. In a recent campaign event, Trump visited a bar that accepts Bitcoin and made his first transaction using the digital currency. This gesture generated some attention in the crypto community and resulted in a slight bump in Bitcoin’s value.
Kamala Harris, in contrast, has not made any public endorsements of cryptocurrency, keeping her focus on broader economic policy.
Davin
Brian
Alex
Hui Xin
Joy
Kikyo