False Alarm: Cointelegraph's Blunder About iShares Bitcoin Spot ETF Pumped Bitcoin Price to 30K
Cointelegraph tweeted that SEC approved iShares' Bitcoin (BTC) Spot ETF, but was confirmed to be false by BlackRock.

1. Project Origin: TRUMP FAMILY’s Road to DeFi
Since its inception, World Liberty Financial has deeply tied its core values to Trump’s political brand, demonstrating that its strategic intention is not technological innovation,
but to leverage its strong brand identity for market penetration and capital fundraising. 1.1. Vision and Mission: "Democratization of Finance" and Political Narratives World Liberty Financial officially launched to the public in September 2024, with its official positioning explicitly stating that the project was "inspired by President Donald Trump's vision." This brand positioning was no accident; it constituted the project's core unique selling point. Its publicly stated mission was to "democratize DeFi" by creating user-friendly tools, aiming to attract mainstream Web2 users and promoting the slogan "Make Crypto and America Great Again." This politically charged propaganda portrayed WLFI as an "anti-establishment" movement against the "rigged" traditional financial system. 1.2. Core Leadership and Operations Team The Trump family's involvement is direct and official. According to project documents, Donald Trump serves as "Chief Cryptocurrency Advocate," while his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, serve as "Web3 Ambassadors." Even his 18-year-old son, Barron Trump, has been given the title of "Chief DeFi Visionary." Could this be the so-called father-son duo?! A three-person core team oversees the project's day-to-day operations: COO Zachary Folkman, Data and Strategy Director Chase Herro, and CEO Zach Witkoff. Notably, Witkoff is the son of Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East advisor. Whether this connection is politically connected is a matter of opinion. 1.3. Initial Strategy: Building a User-Friendly DeFi Lending Portal with Aave The project's initial technical blueprint presented to the public was relatively simple. WLFI's first and only major technical proposal was to launch an instance of the Aave v3 protocol. Aave is one of the most mature and battle-tested lending protocols in the DeFi space. The core of this strategy wasn't to independently develop new DeFi technology, but rather to leverage Aave's existing, robust infrastructure and liquidity pools to build a simplified, newcomer-friendly user interface on top. The goal was to lower the barrier to entry for users in DeFi and thereby attract new users at scale. This strategy demonstrated that the project's initial focus was on leveraging its brand influence to quickly acquire users, rather than innovating the underlying technology. This initially set, relatively conservative goal provides an important reference point for understanding the project's subsequent dramatic strategic shift. The initial lending narrative was simple and easy to understand, helping the project attract public attention and initial funding in its early stages. However, this simple vision quickly gave way to a far more ambitious and complex plan: to build a financial empire centered around stablecoins and publicly listed companies. This shift suggests that the original Aave plan may have been merely a "narrative beachhead"—a readily accepted story for market entry, while the truly complex and lucrative financial machine was being built behind the scenes. This was not a simple business evolution, but a fundamental transformation of the project's core business model: a complete transformation from a software service provider to a financial institution. 2. Investor Constellation: A Mix of Institutions, Insiders, and Controversial Figures World Liberty Financial's investor base is extremely complex, presenting a network of capital comprised of traditional financial institutions, project insiders, and controversial figures in the crypto world. This diverse capital structure, while providing funding for the project, also presents significant reputational risk. 2.1. The Trump Family's Controlling Stake and Financial Arrangements The Trump family holds an absolute dominant position in World Liberty Financial. A Trump business entity called DT Marks DEFI LLC holds a 60% controlling stake in the company. More crucially, this entity is entitled to up to 75% of all WLFI token sales proceeds. This profit-sharing model is extremely rare among startups, going far beyond typical founder equity incentives and ensuring that the vast majority of financing proceeds flow directly into the Trump family's pockets. Based on public documents and market data, the paper value of WLFI tokens held by the Trump family exceeds $6 billion, with Donald Trump himself reportedly controlling approximately two-thirds. This figure makes cryptocurrency the Trump family's primary business interest, surpassing real estate. 2.2. Institutional Endorsement: A Veil of Legitimacy To establish its legitimacy within mainstream financial markets, WLFI successfully attracted the participation of several prominent institutional investors. These included Point72 Asset Management, led by billionaire Steve Cohen; Hong Kong-based Soul Ventures; and DWF Labs, which invested $25 million. The participation of these institutions lent this politically charged crypto project a veneer of traditional financial market approval, serving as a crucial asset for its external publicity and credibility. 2.3. Justin Sun's Key Role: Investment, Advisory, and Regulatory Concerns TRON founder Justin Sun is one of WLFI's cornerstone investors. He initially invested $30 million in the project and later increased his total investment to at least $75 million. In return, Sun was officially appointed as an official advisor to the project, and WLFI's subsequent USD1 stablecoin also chose to run on the TRON network, which he dominates. The most striking aspect of this investment relationship is the delicate timeline of its interactions with US regulators. The SEC has filed a fraud lawsuit against Justin Sun and his company. However, in February 2025, shortly after Trump took office as president, the SEC abruptly dropped the case. This decision reportedly surprised many SEC officials who had been confident of a successful outcome. This series of events—from Justin Sun's substantial investment in the Trump family business to the rapid disappearance of significant regulatory threats following the inauguration of the new US administration—has sparked widespread speculation about a potential quid pro quo. This has transformed WLFI from a mere commercial venture into a potential tool for political influence. For investors, this means that the project's success or failure may no longer hinge on market performance or technological prowess, but instead be closely tied to the US government's political direction and regulatory decisions, introducing a unique and unprecedented risk that cannot be quantified. 2.4. Aqua 1/Web3Port Controversy: Suspicious Capital Another controversial investment came from the UAE-based Aqua 1 Foundation, which injected $100 million into WLFI. However, an independent investigation report pointed out that Aqua 1 has ties to a Hong Kong market maker called Web3Port, which was banned by multiple exchanges for suspected market manipulation. News reports claim that Aqua 1 co-founder "Dave Lee" and Web3Port's David Jia Hua Li are the same person and that the two companies' websites share the same server infrastructure. In response to these allegations, Aqua 1 and Dave Lee publicly denied any operational connection, calling the reports "inaccurate" but did not specify the inaccurate information, citing "ongoing regulatory and compliance procedures." This strategic segmentation of investor backgrounds reveals the project's complex fundraising strategy. On the one hand, the project leverages "clean" institutional capital from sources like Point72 to demonstrate its legitimacy and credibility to the public and traditional markets. On the other hand, it has raised substantial funding from controversial figures like Justin Sun and sources rumored to be linked to tainted entities like Web3Port.3. Strategic Evolution: Transitioning to an Ecosystem Centered on the USD1 Stablecoin
The World Liberty Financial project has undergone a crucial strategic transformation, evolving from a simple application-layer project to a vast ecosystem dedicated to building underlying financial infrastructure, with the USD1 stablecoin at its core.
3.1. From Lending Frontend to Financial Infrastructure
The project's initial narrative was to provide users with "access to third-party DeFi applications," a positioning that made it appear as a portal or aggregator to the DeFi world. However, this narrative fundamentally shifted in March 2025, when the project officially announced the launch of its native stablecoin, USD1, and its commitment to building a "next-generation financial platform." This transformation marked a quantum leap in the project's ambition, scope, and risk profile. 3.2. USD1 Stablecoin In-Depth: Mechanism, Custody, and Growth Drivers Mechanism: USD1 is a fiat-collateralized stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the US dollar. Its reserve assets consist of short-term US Treasury bills, US dollar cash deposits, and other cash equivalents. This is a conservative and mature stablecoin model recognized in the industry, similar to leading stablecoins such as USDC and USDT. Custody: To enhance its credibility, USD1's reserve assets are held by BitGo, a renowned digital asset custodian. BitGo enjoys a strong reputation among institutional clients, and its involvement provides a crucial layer of security for USD1's assets. Growth: USD1 has experienced astonishing growth since its launch. Just over a month after its launch in March 2025, its market capitalization exceeded $2.1 billion, earning it the title of "the fastest-growing stablecoin in history." Key Growth Driver: However, this explosive growth wasn't driven by widespread organic market adoption. The vast majority of its market capitalization stems from a single, massive transaction: a $2 billion investment agreement between Abu Dhabi-based investment firm MGX and Binance, which specified the use of USD1 as the sole medium of exchange. Secondly, there's the lack of USD1 activity on BNB CHAIN. Lack of transparency: Despite the project's commitment to regular third-party audits, as of May 2025, no public audit report or proof of assets detailing the USD1 reserve composition has been released. For stablecoins, reserve transparency is crucial for maintaining user confidence. Later, in June 2025, a co-founder stated that the audit report had been received and would be released soon, but this still reflects a lag in the project's disclosure of key information. This strategic shift reveals the true economic role of stablecoins in the WLFI ecosystem. The WLFI token itself is clearly defined as a pure governance token, without any associated economic rights. So, what exactly is the engine that creates value for the business entity in which the Trump family holds a 60% stake? The answer is the USD1 stablecoin. Similar to the business models of Tether and Circle, issuers of fiat-collateralized stablecoins can generate substantial revenue by investing their reserve assets in interest-bearing financial instruments like U.S. Treasuries. Therefore, stablecoins are not just a product of WLFI; they are the core engine of the entire enterprise, supporting its survival and generating cash flow. Shifting from a lending narrative to a stablecoin is an inevitable choice for the project to build a sustainable business model. However, this growth model also carries significant risks. The so-called "fastest-growing" narrative is a product of financial engineering, not the result of natural market selection. Its market capitalization is highly dependent on single transactions with MGX/Binance, meaning that USD1's liquidity and stability are deeply tied to a very small number of institutional counterparties, creating serious systemic risks. Unlike USDC or USDT, which are integrated into thousands of protocols and widely used by millions of users, USD1's foundation is both narrow and fragile. Any fluctuation in its relationship with MGX or Binance could trigger a catastrophic collapse in its perceived value and utility. 3.3. Ecosystem Partners and Integrations To build its DeFi ecosystem, WLFI is actively partnering with other leading blockchain protocols, including Ondo Finance, Ethena, Chainlink, Sui, and Aave. Furthermore, through its "macro strategy," the project has established a diversified digital asset reserve, holdings including a variety of mainstream crypto assets such as BTC, ETH, TRX, LINK, SUI, and ONDO. 4. ALT5 Sigma Mechanism: Building a Public Market Siphoning Tool The transaction between World Liberty Financial and Nasdaq-listed ALT5 Sigma is the core of the project's financial engineering. Its complexity and unconventional design are extremely rare in both cryptocurrency and traditional financial markets. This mechanism aims to create a tradable public market proxy for the illiquid WLFI token and establish its market valuation through a sophisticated capital closed loop. 4.1. Analysis of the $1.5 Billion "Cryptocurrency Treasury" Transaction In August 2025, WLFI effectively completed its acquisition of controlling stake in ALT5 Sigma (ALTS), a publicly traded company that originally specialized in pain management and later transitioned to a payments technology company. The core of the transaction involved ALT5's announcement of raising $1.5 billion through a private placement and a concurrent private placement to implement a "WLFI Treasury Strategy." As part of the transaction, WLFI's core executive team fully transitioned into ALT5's leadership: WLFI CEO Zach Witkoff became Chairman of ALT5's Board of Directors, and Eric Trump became a member of the Board of Directors. 4.2. Capital Circulation: How WLFI Refunded Its Treasury The ingenuity of this transaction lies in its capital circulation mechanism, which operates as follows: Step 1: WLFI Exchanges Tokens for Equity World Liberty Financial, as the lead investor in ALT5's private placement financing, paid not in cash but in WLFI tokens, issued by the company itself, valued at $750 million. Through this non-cash transaction, WLFI received ALT5 shares and warrants. Step 2: ALT5 Raises Cash from External Investors Meanwhile, ALT5 raises an additional $750 million in cash from other external institutional investors through a private placement. Step 3: ALT5 Uses the Raised Cash to Repurchase WLFI Tokens Finally, ALT5 will use the $750 million in cash raised from external investors to purchase more WLFI tokens directly from World Liberty Financial, replenishing its so-called "corporate treasury." This process forms a perfect closed-loop capital structure: WLFI uses tokens created at no cost to acquire control of a publicly traded company; the publicly traded company then uses real money raised from the public market to purchase WLFI tokens. This operation not only created real demand for the WLFI token but also established a public market price for it through trading by a publicly traded company. 4.3. Strategic Objective: Creating Valuation and Liquidity for Illiquid Assets Prior to the transaction with ALT5, WLFI tokens were non-transferable and therefore had no market price. The ALT5 transaction marked the first official valuation of WLFI tokens—$0.20 per token. This price was set independently by the two parties to the transaction (effectively controlled by the same party), but because it occurred within the framework of a publicly traded company, it created a significant paper wealth for billions of tokens held by insiders. This structure mimics MicroStrategy's strategy of transforming the company into a Bitcoin proxy stock. It effectively turns ALTS stock into a publicly traded proxy for the WLFI token. Investors can indirectly gain exposure to WLFI by purchasing ALTS stock, thus addressing the token's initial lack of liquidity. This mechanism is a perfect blend of regulatory arbitrage and financial alchemy. At its core, it leverages the regulated public market to back and price an unregulated cryptoasset. By orchestrating a transaction in which a Nasdaq-listed company acquires WLFI tokens at a specific price, the project creates a verifiable valuation out of thin air, even requiring SEC filings. This is a form of financial alchemy: transforming a self-issued, illiquid digital token into an asset with verifiable paper value that can then be used as collateral, included on a balance sheet, or as the basis for further financing. Former SEC officials have issued serious warnings about the transaction, noting that its inherent conflict of interest "brings the worst practices of the crypto ecosystem into the regulated public markets." However, from the project's perspective, this conflict of interest is not a vulnerability but a core feature of the mechanism's design. Because the same individuals control both the seller (WLF) and the buyer (ALT5), they can dictate the terms of the transaction entirely to their own advantage. This is not a fair transaction but a carefully choreographed performance designed solely to achieve specific financial goals for WLF's insiders (namely, creating valuation and liquidity). This structure poses significant risks to external investors in ALTS, as their capital is being used to support an asset controlled by management with conflicts of interest within the company.
https://www.mitrade.com/au/insights/news/live-news/article-3-1083176-20250901
5. WLFI Token Economics: Supply, Allocation, and Utility Analysis
The economic model design of the WLFI token is rife with contradictions and opacity, and its supply allocation and release mechanisms appear to be carefully designed to create maximum market advantage for insiders. 5.1. Total Supply and Contradictory Allocation Model The total and maximum supply of WLFI tokens are both 100 billion. However, there are two distinct and conflicting versions circulating in the market regarding how these tokens will be distributed: According to a public statement by project partner Chase Herro, the token distribution plan is: 63% will be sold to public investors, 17% will be used for user rewards, and 20% will be retained for the project team. 5.2. Token Sale Rounds and Early Investor Distribution Through multiple token sale rounds, the WLFI project successfully raised a total of $550 million from over 85,000 KYC-verified participants as of March 2025. However, its early sales process was not without its challenges. A sale in October 2024 was disrupted by a website crash, raising just over $8 million, far short of its $300 million target. Early investors acquired tokens at extremely low prices, including rounds of $0.015 and $0.05 per token. This means that once the tokens are listed, these early investors will be sitting on significant unrealized gains. 5.3. Token Release Plan: Unlock on September 1st and Future Lockups According to the project's announcement, WLFI tokens are scheduled to begin trading on the market on September 1st. This initial unlock is specifically for early investors: 20% of the tokens they purchased in the $0.015 and $0.05 rounds will be released and become tradable. Notably, the strike price between ALTS and WLFI is $0.2. The number of tokens unlocked this time represents approximately 5% of the total WLFI supply. This is a key design decision, as it ensures an extremely low circulating supply (i.e., "floating disk") during the initial stages of the listing. At the same time, tokens allocated to founders, team members, and advisors will remain locked upon listing to prevent an immediate sell-off. The remaining 80% of tokens held by investors will remain locked, with the specific release schedule to be determined by a future community governance vote. This token release schedule is carefully designed to create a "low circulation, high FDV" market dynamic. By unlocking only a tiny portion of the total supply (approximately 5%), circulating tokens are artificially kept scarce. Simultaneously, the project's strong brand and institutional investor backing generate significant market hype, driving up its price in the futures market and overall FDV. This "low circulation, high FDV" situation is a classic breeding ground for market manipulation. Even a small amount of buy capital can trigger a dramatic price surge. This price surge is extremely beneficial to insiders, as it significantly inflates the paper value of their large locked-up tokens, even if these tokens cannot be sold yet. 5.4. Utility Analysis: A Pure Governance Token with No Economic Rights The official positioning of the WLFI token is very clear: it is a pure governance token. Aside from the right to vote on the future direction of the protocol, holders do not have any rights to share in protocol revenue, dividends, or other economic benefits. Its sole utility is to participate in platform governance voting. However, this "governance" utility may be an illusion in reality. Given the large and highly concentrated token holdings by insiders, the outcome of any community vote is effectively predetermined. The founding team and its allies will always have enough votes to dominate any decision. Therefore, for ordinary retail investors, the "governance" function is meaningless. The token's true purpose is not decentralized governance but as a tradable speculative asset. Its value comes entirely from market sentiment and Trump's brand effect, while its price dynamics are precisely managed by the project side by controlling the rhythm of supply release.
Cointelegraph tweeted that SEC approved iShares' Bitcoin (BTC) Spot ETF, but was confirmed to be false by BlackRock.
Fantom Foundation finds itself contending with a significant breach with $657K drained in the depletion of more than 35 crypto wallets.
But perhaps because it is always subject to attacks, and with a $50 million exploit in 2019 looming over their heads, Upbit's approach towards security and risk is more prudent than most.
The acquisition follows a relatively recent fundingraising for BitGo and a partnership with South Korea's Hana Bank.
These exchanges have suspended deposits and withdrawals specifically for Wrapped EVER (WEVER) tokens, with native EVER tokens remaining secure and unaffected on Octus Bridge.
Binance.US no longer permits USD withdrawals; asks users to convert USD to stablecoins or other digital assets.
The ESMA further cautioned that even after implementation, investors should be prepared for the possibility of incurring total losses.
Experience a digital gaming revolution with cryptocurrency payments in Roblox!
The burn rate of Shiba Inu ($SHIB), the meme-inspired cryptocurrency, has witnessed an astonishing surge of more than 250% within a mere 24-hour span. This surge was triggered by a series of 23 substantial transactions, resulting in the removal of a substantial 47.9 million SHIB tokens from circulation.
Sui under the investigative lens of the FSS with allegations centred on inaccurate reports pertaining to its circulating supply and the purported gains derived from staking activities.