$500 million saved a systemic crisis. In January 2024, the stablecoin TUSD faced a critical moment—$456 million in reserves "disappeared," its price plummeted to $0.97, panic spread, and a chain of liquidations was imminent. Justin Sun decisively injected $500 million in emergency liquidity, stabilizing TUSD and preventing a potential collapse that could have affected the entire DeFi ecosystem. Nearly two years later, on October 17, 2025, the Dubai International Financial Centre Digital Economy Court (hereinafter referred to as the Dubai Court) issued a global asset freeze order, freezing $456 million in assets belonging to the parties involved. This legal battle, spanning Hong Kong, Singapore, and Dubai, finally saw a decisive breakthrough. This is not only the first global asset freeze order issued by an international court in the history of cryptocurrencies, but also a milestone in the legalization of digital finance.
01 How $456 Million “Disappeared”
In December 2020, the Asian consortium Techteryx acquired the operating rights of the TUSD stablecoin.
In the transaction, the seller, TrueCoin, guaranteed that TUSD's dollar reserves were fully held in custodial accounts and were free from any liens or encumbrances.
However, this statement faced real challenges during the subsequent operational handover.
To maintain operational continuity, Techteryx did not immediately change its custodian and continued to entrust First Digital Trust (FDT), a Hong Kong-based trust institution, to manage its US dollar reserves. In early 2021, Techteryx sought ways to grow its hundreds of millions of dollars in cash. A financial advisor recommended the Aria Commodities Finance Fund (Aria CFF), a fund registered in the Cayman Islands that invests in commodity trade finance. The instructions were clear: the funds must go into the Cayman-regulated Aria CFF fund account. However, problems arose during execution. According to evidence disclosed by the Dubai court, between 2021 and 2022, FDT transferred $456 million in six installments to Aria Commodities DMCC in Dubai, a privately owned trading company wholly owned by Matthew Brittain's wife. Matthew Brittain himself is the manager of the Cayman Aria fund, and the couple effectively controlled the entire funding chain. This is not a simple operational error, but a fundamental shift in legal nature. The Cayman Aria CFF is a regulated fund where investors hold fund shares. In contrast, the Dubai Aria DMCC is merely an ordinary trading company; once the funds entered, they became unsecured debt. The lawsuit revealed more details. FDT CEO Vincent Chok received approximately $15.5 million in undisclosed commissions through an intermediary entity, which is suspected to be the root cause of his breach of trust instructions. In 2023, when Techteryx requested to redeem its investment, Aria DMCC refused. The reason given was "clever"—compliance considerations prevented the release of funds in a short period. This is a cunning delaying tactic, attempting to package the "asset misappropriation case" as an "anti-money laundering compliance case." The truth is, the money had already been invested in illiquid, long-term projects and could not be liquidated in the short term. In January 2024, the crisis fully erupted. Binance, the world's largest trading platform, removed TUSD from Launchpool and switched to supporting FDUSD, which was interpreted by the market as a risk signal. Panic selling ensued. On January 15th, the price of TUSD severely decoupled from its peg, briefly falling below $0.97. Even more alarming is the chain reaction: TUSD is widely used as collateral in DeFi lending protocols such as Aave and Compound. Once the price decouples, it will trigger a chain of liquidations worth billions of dollars, potentially severely damaging the entire DeFi ecosystem. At this critical juncture, Justin Sun acted decisively. He provided Techteryx with approximately $500 million in emergency liquidity support, structured as a loan with priority repayment rights. The funds were used directly to meet users' redemption needs, ensuring that TUSD maintained a 1:1 redemption capacity. By employing a "firefighting first, then accountability" approach, TUSD successfully weathered the run on deposits. As the founder of the Tron ecosystem, Justin Sun deeply understands the systemic importance of TUSD. A collapse would not only severely damage the Tron ecosystem but could also trigger a domino effect in the DeFi market. This rescue demonstrated a strategic vision that transcended short-term gains—using capital to stabilize the situation first, then recovering losses through legal means. According to a prior agreement, any funds recovered from Aria in the future will be prioritized for repaying this emergency loan. After stabilizing the situation, Justin Sun offered a $50 million reward on social media for information regarding Aria. The clues to the destination of the funds sent a clear signal to the entire industry: those who misappropriate funds will pay the price. Global Pursuit: A Three-Region Legal Battle Stabilizing the market is only the first step; recovering assets is the key. With the support of Justin Sun, Techteryx launched a global asset preservation legal campaign, spanning three jurisdictions. First stop: Hong Kong. Techteryx has sued FDT and its CEO in the High Court of Hong Kong, accusing them of breach of trust, fraudulent misappropriation of funds, and receiving illegal commissions. The main purpose of the Hong Kong lawsuit is to establish FDT's legal liability. It was through the Hong Kong lawsuit that TUSD obtained bank transaction records proving the flow of funds to Dubai and "rebate" commissions. Second stop: Singapore. Meanwhile, Techteryx and the original TUSD owner, TrueCoin, arbitrated at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre regarding the outstanding acquisition payment and the status of concealed assets. The Singapore court issued an injunction, suspending some of the Hong Kong proceedings to uphold the priority of the arbitration. Third stop: Dubai. Since the funds ultimately flowed to Dubai, Techteryx filed a lawsuit directly in the Digital Economy Court of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC). The core demand was clear: to have the court confirm that the $456 million held by Aria DMCC legally belonged to Techteryx and to apply for a global asset freeze order. Breakthrough Development: Issuance of a Global Asset Freeze Order. In October 2025, the Dubai court made a landmark ruling. The court issued a global asset freeze order, freezing $456 million in assets belonging to Aria DMCC and its affiliates worldwide. The court held that FDT's transfer of funds to Aria DMCC violated the trust order. Under common law principles, a third party automatically becomes the "presumed trustee" of trust assets when they know or should have known that the funds are from an improper source. This money never legally belonged to Aria DMCC. The court paid particular attention to Aria DMCC's ongoing "securitization" plan—an attempt to package illiquid assets such as mining machines and debt into notes for sale. The court determined that this was a means of "laundering" illicit assets and transferring them to bona fide third parties, posing an extremely high risk of asset dissipation. The Dubai courts, based on relevant laws, have established their power as a “supplementary jurisdiction”: Even if the main litigation is conducted abroad, the Dubai courts have the authority to issue global asset freeze orders as long as the defendant has assets in Dubai. This establishes Dubai's position as a center of “long-arm jurisdiction” for global digital asset rights protection. The enforcement of these freeze orders is unprecedented: freezing assets worth $456 million globally, prohibiting any form of asset transfer, requiring disclosure of the final destination of funds upon punitive notice, and potentially subjecting company executives to imprisonment for violations. This has created a powerful deterrent effect on the actual controllers, such as Matthew Brittain. The significance of this rights protection campaign far exceeds the $456 million itself. Breaking the Myth of Liability Exemption for Offshore Trusts: The Dubai court ruling demonstrates that custodians must bear legal responsibility when they are aware of problematic fund flows or even involvement in the transfer of benefits. This forces all stablecoin issuers to re-examine their custody agreements, shifting from "nominal holding" to "penetrating monitoring." Establishing a New Judicial Status in Dubai By issuing a global freeze order, Dubai sent a clear signal to global crypto companies: it is not only a crypto-friendly registration location, but also an emerging judicial center capable of handling complex cross-border asset disputes. Compared to the US SEC's administrative enforcement, which primarily relies on fines, Dubai offers a more commercialized and judicial dispute resolution path. Setting an Industry Benchmark for Rights Protection Justin Sun proved that even when facing complex offshore trust structures, cross-border fund misappropriation, and jurisdictional challenges, justice will ultimately prevail with sufficient resource investment and legal strategies. Summary of TUSD at 4.56 The multi-million dollar rights protection case is a microcosm of the transformation of the crypto finance industry from unregulated growth to institutional reconstruction. Justin Sun, through a dual approach of a $500 million bailout and a global legal crackdown, not only saved TUSD but also achieved a textbook example of crisis management and asset recovery. Freezing the assets is only the first step in the recovery; how to convert the frozen illiquid assets into cash and repay previous loans remains a challenge for subsequent enforcement. However, for the entire industry, this case has become a Damocles' sword hanging over the heads of all dishonest custodians and asset misappropriators. In the crypto world, the flow of funds is not entirely untraceable, and the long arm of the law is learning to transcend national borders and the boundaries of code.