Author: Tina Dai Source: X, @howdai27 Translation: Shan Ouba, Golden Finance
In the world of cryptocurrency, a "hot launch" (i.e. launching a token to quickly kick-start growth) has become a popular strategy for new projects seeking to quickly gain attention. My friend and investor Mason recently explored this concept, shedding light on why some projects choose this approach. But as with all things in cryptocurrency, a hot launch is a double-edged sword. In this article, we'll dive into the impact of launching a token before product-market fit, and explore strategies that may help projects cross the chasm to achieve more sustainable growth.
Why Projects Choose the Hot Launch Problem
Mason's article explains the appeal of the hot launch problem. Essentially, it’s about using tokens — or even the promise of tokens — to overcome the classic cold start problem that plagues new networks and market points.
Mason suggests that the strategy is particularly effective in two situations:
Red Ocean Markets: In a competitive space, with known demand, tokens can help latecomers quickly bootstrap liquidity and a user base. Think of GMX and dYdX in the derivatives market, or the meteoric rise of Blur in the NFT trading space. Recent success stories have used credits to bootstrap LRTs, lending platforms (e.g. Morpho), and bridges (e.g. Layer0).
Passive Supply-Side Networks: When the work that needs to be done is primarily passive — staking, providing liquidity, or running set-and-forget hardware — tokens have proven to be powerful incentivizers. Examples here include Grass or Morpheus.
Hot launches fueled by speculation and FOMO can indeed kick-start network effects. But here’s the problem.
Pitfall: Token-Market Fit ≠ Product-Market Fit
While a token price surge may initially feel like a win, it’s important to recognize that token-market fit is not the same as product-market fit. Token-market fit is simple: over the long run, prices go up because more people believe they’ll go up than believe they’ll go down. This is exemplified by blue-chip tokens like Bitcoin and Ethereum, which have demonstrated significant price appreciation over time based on their ability to attract sustained holders.
However, product-market fit is about creating real, sustainable value through product improvements and community. It’s the difference between holding a token for price speculation and using a product that solves a real problem. Bitcoin and Ethereum have successfully made this transition: Bitcoin by solidifying its role as digital gold, and Ethereum by moving beyond mere speculation by creating real network utility that incentivizes developers and users to participate in its ecosystem.
Most projects never successfully transition from token-market fit to product-market fit. This disconnect can be dangerous, potentially masking a lack of real utility and leading to unsustainable, speculation-driven growth. Teams may find themselves catering to token holders instead of actual users, which leads to skewed priorities and can result in unsustainable growth driven by speculation and marketing hype.
Crossing the Crypto Chasm: From Token-Market Fit to Product-Market Fit
A hot launch may light a flame, but it’s the quality of the fuel — your product and community — that’s what keeps the flame burning. To build a sustainable crypto project, transitioning from pure token-market fit to a combination of token and product-market fit is critical, but rare. This reflects the concept of “crossing the chasm” popularized by Geoffrey Moore.
If you commit to a hot launch approach, strategic token economics can buy you time to cross the product-market fit chasm. The key is to carefully balance between token supply and demand while strategically evolving token economics so that they are closely aligned with the success of your product and network. This approach aims to create a symbiotic relationship where token value becomes increasingly correlated to real utility and adoption metrics rather than pure speculation. As a project matures, token economics should shift from an initial growth catalyst to a sustainable, value-driven mechanism that directly reflects and reinforces the health and expansion of the ecosystem.
Here are some strategies projects can consider as they cross the crypto chasm and move from attracting speculators to providing real utility to a broader user base:
Initial Launch:
Pitch a Compelling Narrative: In the cryptocurrency space, a compelling story can be as powerful as the technology itself. Weave a story that connects your token roadmap to real-world impact or product advancement, attracting mission-driven early adopters. Remember, people invest in stories they believe in; a well-told story can turn token holders into passionate advocates, driving adoption and long-term commitment to a project’s success.
Strategically Low Float (Caution): Launch with a limited token supply to generate initial attention and value while reserving a large number of tokens for future incentives. This approach sacrifices the immediate amount of funds raised to gain greater long-term control over token allocation, enabling continued user acquisition and retention as the project progresses toward product-market fit. However, be aware that low float makes the token highly sensitive to market conditions. This can result in extreme volatility, potentially causing the token to behave like a meme asset before achieving significant product traction.
Targeted Tiered Airdrops: Strategically allocate your initial tokens to users who align with your project’s long-term vision. Prioritize potential contributors, such as developers, content creators, or active community members, over likely short-term speculators. Implement a tiered system where different user categories receive different amounts of tokens based on their potential value to the ecosystem. Clearly communicate the criteria for future airdrops after your token hits the market, creating a roadmap for continued participation and rewarding behaviors that contribute to your project’s growth and success.
Initial Staking Incentives: Implement a staking system with higher initial rewards that decrease as network participation grows. This approach is often seen in DePin projects, incentivizing early holders to maintain their positions, reducing selling pressure and cultivating a loyal core user base.
Liquidity Bootstrapping: Focus on creating efficient, well-balanced liquidity pools to promote organic trading activity while retaining a majority of token supply for future ecosystem development and user incentives. To bootstrap liquidity, consider offering token rewards to those who participate in liquidity provision.
Introduce Basic Token Utility: Implement simple, clear token use cases at launch that ensure immediate value in your ecosystem. Keep it simple: for example, holding X tokens can get you Y benefits (e.g., exclusive NFTs, future allowlist slots, or special user status). This approach ensures that even at the beginning, your token has real utility, encouraging adoption and retention, while laying the foundation for more complex use cases as your project grows.
Crossing the Chasm:
Adaptive Supply Schedule: Develop a transparent, flexible token supply schedule that responds to network growth and product milestones. This approach ensures that token supply grows in tandem with true ecosystem development, incentivizing meaningful user participation rather than pure speculation.
Token Economics Tied to Product Success: As your product matures, strategically expand token use cases, moving to models where token value is directly tied to product usage and network growth. For example, implement buyback mechanisms, revenue sharing, or burn protocols. Projects like MakerDAO, Lido, and select exchange tokens demonstrate how token economics that are tightly tied to product success can benefit more from a hot launch. Consider integrating your token into a broader loyalty program that rewards holding and active platform participation, creating a symbiotic relationship between token value and ecosystem health.
Tiered Staking Incentives: Implement a multi-tiered system that rewards long-term holding and active participation. This can include node sales, with upfront cost increases, to encourage long-term commitment. Offer upgraded benefits based on holding time and participation level, such as enhanced governance rights, higher yields, or exclusive features.
Community Cultivation: Cultivate a user base that believes in your project’s long-term vision, rather than just chasing short-term gains. However, be aware that even the most passionate communities have a “price-driven half-life” — their enthusiasm will wane if token prices don’t ultimately reflect the project’s success.
Strategic Partnerships: Build partnerships that enhance your ecosystem’s value proposition. Ideally, these shouldn’t focus solely on collaborations around rewards, as those are short-lived relationships. If offering token rewards, one way to encourage ongoing value is through vesting around milestones.
These suggested strategies are designed to balance price stability while buying time for projects to achieve true product-market fit. The goal is to create a flywheel where token value and product utility reinforce each other, ultimately transitioning from speculative interest to sustainable ecosystem growth.
The Case for Post-PMF Token Launch
Given the risks posed by the hot start problem, there is a strong argument for delaying a token launch until product-market fit is achieved. In the case of Magic Eden, they built a successful NFT marketplace and established a strong user base before even considering a token. This approach allowed them to focus on product development and user acquisition without being distracted by token price fluctuations. When they finally launched their token, it breathed new life into their platform, rekindled user engagement, and opened up new avenues for growth and ecosystem expansion.
Launching a token is like starting a fire, if you prepare enough kindling and the token accelerator works well. If not, you’ll need to work overtime to prevent the feeble flame from dying out.
By launching tokens after a PMF, projects can:
Reward real users, not speculators, even if that means upsetting bad actors.
Use tokens as growth accelerators for proven products.
Navigate regulatory waters more smoothly and leverage creative business models or value capture mechanisms.
Use token launches as powerful marketing campaigns for established products.
This strategy is not without its challenges — you may initially grow slower than your hot-start competitors, and you may stare at CoinMarketCap thinking “if we had a token, that could be us”. But the tradeoff is the potential for more sustainable, more organic growth, and ultimately a more valuable network (and token).
The future belongs to projects that master the art of token-driven growth
In the evolving cryptocurrency space, the path from token launch to sustainable growth is not a binary choice between hot and cold launches, but a spectrum of strategic decisions. The real challenge lies in the careful balance: using token economics to catalyze initial traction while building real utility and community engagement.
The successful projects will be those that view tokens as powerful tools within the broader ecosystem, rather than as an end-all destination. They will create mechanisms that combine speculative interest with real-world value creation, effectively leveraging tokens to cross the divide between early adopters and mainstream users. Ultimately, the projects that thrive will be those that master the art of token-driven growth, using it to accelerate true product-market fit, rather than as a substitute for it.