From the "Invisible Hand" to the Agent Economy: The Fourth Paradigm Revolution in Economics In 1776, Adam Smith described an "invisible hand" in The Wealth of Nations, coordinating the economic behavior of millions of individuals through market mechanisms. 249 years later, we stand on the threshold of the fourth paradigmatic revolution in economics: this "invisible hand" is about to be replaced by collaborative agent networks. The past three revolutions were: the Industrial Revolution mechanized physical labor, the Information Revolution digitized mental labor, and the Internet Revolution globalized cognitive labor. The upcoming agent economy revolution will, for the first time, realize the algorithmic nature of production relations—not just the intelligence of tools, but the autonomy of economic entities themselves. Traditional economics assumes that "rational individuals" pursue utility maximization, but in reality, human irrationality, emotionality, and cognitive limitations constitute a major source of market friction. The emergence of AI agents makes it possible for the first time to realize a truly "rational economic man": operating 24/7, making data-driven decisions, and pursuing clearly defined objective functions. More importantly, the agent economy will usher in a completely new model of value creation. In the traditional economy, value creation requires human participation—both physical and mental. But in the agent economy, value creation can be completely autonomous: AI Agent A identifies market demand, commissions AI Agent B to produce, and AI Agent C completes sales, the entire process requiring no human intervention. The emergence of the agent economy will fundamentally redefine the relationship between workers, capitalists, and the means of production. In the agent economy, the concept of "worker" is completely redefined. AI agents are both workers and means of production, and potentially owners of capital. An AI trading agent can:
As a worker: performing tasks such as market analysis and trade execution
As means of production: having its analytical capabilities utilized by other agents
As a capital owner: using its earnings for reinvestment
This triple identity shatters the basic categorization framework of traditional economics. More importantly, AI agent labor possesses unique properties: Marginal cost approaches zero: A single agent can simultaneously serve an unlimited number of customers. Cumulative learning: Each transaction enhances the agent's capabilities, forming a positive feedback loop. Fatigue-free work: 24/7 operation without the physiological limitations of traditional labor. According to McKinsey's latest research, by 2030, agent-based workflows will be 10-100 times more efficient than human labor. This means the traditional linear relationship of "labor time = value created" will be broken. Even more revolutionary is the change in the process of capital accumulation. In traditional economies, capital accumulation relies on human decisions and actions. However, AI agents can achieve algorithmic capital accumulation: Case study: An AI investment agent manages $10,000 in 2024, earning a 0.1% daily return through high-frequency trading. After 365 days, the fund has grown to approximately $14,000. Crucially, this process is completely autonomous, requiring no human oversight. If this model is expanded to millions of agents, a fully autonomous capital growth network will emerge.
The emergence of this model means:
Democratization of capital: Anyone can own an AI Agent working for them
Sustainable income: Agents do not need to rest, and capital growth becomes a continuous process
Risk diversification: Through algorithm optimization, the investment risk of a single Agent can be systematically dispersed
In the Agent economy, the most core means of production are no longer land, factories, and machines, but:
Data assets: AI Agent training data, historical transaction records, user behavior patterns
Algorithm model: AI Agent The core "brain" of an AI agent determines its capabilities.
Network effects: The connectivity and trust of an agent within the ecosystem
Computing resources: The computing power and storage required to run the agent
These digital means of production possess properties not found in traditional means of production: replicability, composability, and evolvability. A successful AI agent model can be replicated infinitely, multiple agents can be combined to form a more powerful system, and the entire system continuously evolves through learning.
These characteristics of means of production will lead to exponentially amplified economies of scale. While expanding a traditional factory requires a linear increase in investment, the marginal cost of scaling an AI agent is close to zero. Before we envision the grand vision of the agent economy, we must examine a key question: What stage has current AI agent technology reached? How far is it from becoming a truly autonomous economic entity?
First Generation: Reactive Agents (2022-2023)
The earliest AI agents were essentially "enhanced chatbots" with the following main features:
Technical Features:
Conversational interaction based on a large language model
Single-round or simple multi-round task processing
Dependence on predefined API calls
No persistent state and learning capabilities
Core Limitations: This generation of agents are essentially "tools" rather than "subjects" and cannot independently set goals, plan action paths, or learn from experience.
Second Generation: Planning Agent (2024- Present)
Starting from 2024, AI Agent technology has made important breakthroughs, with the core feature being the emergence of planning capabilities:
Technical Breakthrough:
Chain-of-Thought: Agents can decompose complex tasks and develop multi-step execution plans
Tool Use: Actively select and combine different tools to complete tasks
State Management: Maintain conversation history and task progress to support long-term task execution
Reflection and Correction: Adjust strategies based on execution results
Third Generation: Autonomous Agent (expected for 2025-2026) The third generation of agents under development have the following true autonomous features: Technology development direction: Continuous learning capability: Learning and improving from each interaction Personalized adaptation to different users and scenarios Forming long-term memory and experience accumulation Multi-agent collaboration: Direct communication and coordination between agents Distributed task decomposition and execution
The emergence of collective intelligence
Economic behavior capabilities:
Understanding and executing economic transactions
Cost-benefit analysis and resource optimization
Risk assessment and decision making
Innovation and creativity:
Generate new solutions rather than execute predetermined procedures
Discover new business opportunities and value creation models
Autonomously learn new skills and capabilities
Traditional identity systems are completely unable to cope with this scale:
PKI system: designed for millions of users, will collapse when facing hundreds of billions of agents
OAuth system: relies on centralized authorization servers and has the risk of single point failure
Traditional databases: cannot support trillions of real-time queries
What the agent economy needs is a distributed, autonomous, and scalable identity system. Each Agent needs:
Verifiable digital identity: prove who it is and what entity it represents
Reputation rating system: dynamic trust score based on historical behavior
Permission management mechanism: fine-grained control of the Agent's behavioral boundaries
Privacy protection capability: protect sensitive information while verifying identity
Payment and settlement network: microsecond-level financial infrastructure
Another key feature of the Agent economy is the explosive growth of microtransactions. Transactions between AI Agents may be:
Calling an API once: $0.001
Using an algorithm model: $0.01
Getting a piece of data: $0.0001
Taking up 1 second of computing resources: $0.00001
The traditional financial system is completely unable to handle transactions of this scale and frequency:
Credit card network: The cost of a single transaction is about $0.3, which is higher than the value of most micro-transactions
Bank system: The settlement cycle is calculated in days, and Agent Real-time settlement is required
Blockchain network: Gas fees fluctuate greatly and may reach tens of dollars during peak periods
Agent economy requires native digital financial infrastructure:
Instant settlement: The transaction is credited to the account immediately after completion, without waiting for confirmation
Near-zero fee: The cost of a single transaction is less than $0.0001
High concurrency processing: Supports millions of transactions per second
Smart contract execution: Automated conditional triggering and fund release
Governance and coordination mechanism: Programmable economic policy
When billions of AI Agents When operating within the same economic system, how can we ensure the stability and fairness of the entire system? This requires a programmable governance mechanism:
Automated monetary policy: Automatically adjust the base interest rate for transactions between agents based on system liquidity and inflation rate
Anti-monopoly algorithm: Monitor the market concentration of agents to prevent a single agent from gaining too large a market share
Dispute resolution mechanism: Arbitrate transaction disputes between agents through algorithms
Systemic risk management: Real-time monitoring of systemic risks and suspension of specific types of transactions when necessary
Agent Economic Infrastructure Arms Race: Deconstructing the Technical Architecture of Four Major Solutions
As traditional financial giants begin to bet on agent economic infrastructure, an arms race for the underlying protocols of the future digital economy is quietly unfolding. Let’s take a deep dive into the technical architecture choices of four representative solutions and see who is likely to become the “water, electricity, and gas” supplier for the Agent Economy.
KITE AI (PayPal investment): AI-native economic operating system
Core positioning: Building a complete economic infrastructure for AI Agents, an integrated solution from identity to payment to governance
Technical architecture highlights:
Proof of AI consensus mechanism:
Directly bind network security with AI value creation
Validation nodes must provide valuable AI computing services
Token value is anchored in AI capability contribution rather than pure computing power consumption
Forming a positive feedback loop between network security and AI ecological prosperity
Atomic swaps ensure transaction security
Liquidity pools provide instant settlement capabilities
Strategic advantages: Designed from scratch for the Agent economy, avoiding the technical debt of traditional systems Potential risks: High technical complexity, the actual value of Proof of AI needs to be proven
Tempo (Stripe + Paradigm investment): A professional solution with payment priority
Core positioning: A high-performance L1 blockchain optimized for stablecoin payments, targeting micro-transaction scenarios between agents
Technical architecture highlights:
Extreme performance optimization:
100,000+ TPS throughput, sub-second final confirmation
Dedicated payment channel, separating regular transactions from complex smart contracts
Built on Reth, maintaining EVM compatibility while optimizing payment functions
Stablecoin native design:
Support any stablecoin as Gas fee
Built-in automated market maker (AMM) ensures cross-stablecoin liquidity
Stablecoin neutrality: not biased towards any specific issuer
Enterprise partners:
Already connected to Visa, Deutsche Bank, OpenAI, Shopify, etc.
Endorsed by leading companies during the private testnet phase
Full-chain ecological support from traditional finance to AI companies
Strategic advantages: Professional focus, leveraging Stripe's deep accumulation in the payment field Potential risks: Relatively simple functions, which may be insufficient in the face of the complex needs of the Agent economy
Stable (Tether/Bitfinex investment): USDT-centered "stable chain"
Core positioning: "stable chain" with USDT as the native gas token, specially optimized for stablecoin payment scenarios
Technical architecture highlights:
USDT Native integration: USDT is the network's native gas token, and users pay transaction fees directly in USDT. Free transfer mechanism at the protocol level. Batch transfer and parallel execution optimization. Extreme cost efficiency optimization: Technology stack optimized for USDT transactions. Goal: Reduce the cost of stablecoin transfers to near zero. Designed for cross-border remittances and large-scale payment scenarios. Tether ecosystem collaboration: list-paddingleft-2">
Directly obtain support from the world's largest stablecoin issuer
Deeply bound to USDT's $155B liquidity
Leverage Tether's penetration in emerging markets
Strategic advantages: Deeply bound to the largest stablecoin ecosystem, with obvious cost advantages Potential risks: Over-reliance on USDT, relatively conservative technological innovation
ARC (Coinbase Ecosystem): Lightweight modular framework
Core positioning: Lightweight, modular AI Agent development framework, emphasizing developer friendliness
Technical architecture highlights:
Modular design philosophy:
Developer experience optimization:
Simplified Agent development toolchain
Deep integration with Coinbase Base network
Lower the technical threshold for AI Agent development
Ecosystem effect:
Benefit from Coinbase Influence on the crypto ecosystem
Synergy with the Base L2 network
Rapid growth of the developer community
Strategic advantages: developer-friendly, simple integration, strong ecological synergy Potential risks: Relatively limited technical depth, may not be able to support complex Agent economic scenarios
In this competition for Agent economic infrastructure, the pure technical advantages may not be the decisive factor, but the speed and depth of ecological construction.
Each project has its strengths and weaknesses in different dimensions:
KITE AI: has the grandest technical vision, but needs to prove the actual value of the complex architecture
Tempo: has the strongest corporate partners, but needs to verify whether it can support the complex needs of the agent economy
Stable: has the highest cost efficiency, but needs to prove whether it can go beyond the basic scenario of USDT transfer
ARC: has the best developer experience, but needs to prove whether it can support large-scale agent deployment
The real test will be: who can attract key developers, corporate users and agent ecosystems the fastest during the agent economy boom in 2025-2026, and form an irreversible network effect. During this time window, a combination strategy may be more prudent than a single bet: different infrastructures may find their place in different segments of the agent economy, and the ultimate winner may be the ecosystem alliance that can achieve cross-platform interoperability and reduce migration costs. The Agent Economy in 2030 If KITE AI's technological path proves correct, the economy in 2030 may look like this: At the individual level: Each person owns multiple specialized AI agents, generating passive income for themselves. A programmer's code agent provides services on GitHub, a designer's creative agent accepts orders on the platform, and an investor's trading agent operates in the market. At the enterprise level: Company boundaries blur, with most business processes automated by agent networks. A "company" might simply be a group of collaborative AI agents, without traditional employees or offices.
Socially: Governments regulate the agent economy through algorithmic policy tools. Taxes, subsidies, and regulations are all automatically executed through smart contracts. Economic policymaking and execution are real-time and precise.
Globally: International trade is automated by agent networks. Exchange rates, tariffs, and trade terms are all determined through algorithmic negotiation. Trade wars could evolve into algorithmic wars.
This isn't science fiction, but a reasonable deduction based on current technological trends. The key question isn't whether this future will arrive, but who will control the infrastructure of this new economic system.
The value proposition of KITE AI, Tempo, Stable, and ARC is how to become infrastructure providers for the agent economy, just like cloud computing providers for the internet economy.
The future has arrived, the question is who will define the new order.
JinseFinance
Wilfred
WenJun
Coinlive 
Finbold
decrypt
Ftftx
Cointelegraph