Author: Han Weili, Vice Dean of the School of Software, Fudan UniversitySource: Study Times, September 10, 2025, Page 6
Introduction:Currently,the total market capitalization of global stablecoins has exceeded US$280 billion.they are widely used in scenarios such as transaction settlement, cross-border payments, and asset tokenization. Their development not only impacts the digital financial ecosystem but also poses new challenges to financial risk prevention and control. The application of stablecoins relies on market trust in them. This trust stems from both the transparent and verifiable mechanisms built on the underlying technology and the reliability and regulatory guarantees of the anchoring mechanism. A deep understanding of the technical principles and trust underlying its "stability" is essential for seizing future opportunities for digital financial innovation and balancing potential regulatory risks. Amid the accelerating penetration of digital finance into the global trade system, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum have garnered widespread attention. However, their volatile price fluctuations have hindered their adoption as mainstream payment platforms. Stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and USDC, through their peg to fiat currencies, retain the advantages of blockchain-based payments, such as efficient circulation and low costs, while avoiding the instability and other drawbacks of traditional cryptocurrencies. Consequently, they have become a hotspot for digital financial innovation. Recent legislation and regulations introduced in the United States, the European Union, and Hong Kong, China, have laid a compliant foundation for the development of stablecoins. Stablecoins are gaining favor with compliant investors worldwide and are gradually integrating into the mainstream financial system. Currently, the total global market capitalization of stablecoins has exceeded $280 billion, and they are widely used in scenarios such as transaction settlement, cross-border payments, and asset tokenization. Their development not only impacts the digital financial ecosystem but also poses new challenges for financial risk prevention and control. The adoption of stablecoins relies on market trust, which stems from both the transparent and verifiable mechanisms built by the underlying technology and the reliability and regulatory assurance of the anchoring mechanism. Therefore, a deep understanding of the technical principles and trust logic behind their "stability" is essential for seizing future opportunities for digital financial innovation and navigating potential regulatory risks. Stablecoins are digital assets issued based on blockchain technology, maintaining their price stability relative to fiat currencies through an "anchoring mechanism." Initially used as a medium for direct exchange in cryptocurrency transactions, they later evolved into underlying assets for participation in financial activities such as lending and staking within the decentralized financial ecosystem. Beyond cryptocurrency trading, stablecoins, due to their near-instant settlement speed, low transaction costs, and 24/7 borderless circulation, are increasingly being used in cross-border payments and trade settlements. The development of stablecoins has evolved from exploration to standardization. In 2014, Tether officially launched USDT, a stablecoin backed 1:1 by fiat currency, introducing the value of the US dollar to the cryptocurrency market. Thanks to its intuitive peg model, USDT quickly achieved widespread adoption and became the primary value stabilization tool in the crypto ecosystem. In 2017, MakerDAO issued DAI, pioneering the "over-collateralized crypto asset + smart contract liquidation" model and driving the development of decentralized stablecoins. In 2020, the decentralized finance boom fueled a surge in demand for stablecoins. Stablecoins introduced the concept of "stability" to the high-risk crypto market, allowing these complex financial activities to proceed relatively safely and efficiently. In 2022, the algorithmic stablecoin UST collapsed due to algorithmic failures, attracting global regulatory attention. The introduction of regulatory laws and regulations in 2025, such as the United States' "Guiding and Establishing a National Innovation Stablecoin in the United States Act" (the "GENIUS Act") and Hong Kong's "Stablecoin Ordinance," laid a foundation for compliance in the stablecoin industry and provided market participants with clearer expectations for its development direction. Since then, stablecoins have entered a new phase of "compliant development." The current stablecoin market exhibits two distinct characteristics: First, concentration at the top. As of August 2025, the total stablecoin market capitalization exceeded $280 billion, with USDT holding a dominant position with approximately 60% of the market share, followed closely by other stablecoins such as USDC. This reflects the market's deep trust in off-chain assets, such as fiat-collateralized models. Second, reliance on mainstream public blockchains. Ethereum, Tron, and Solana account for the majority of the stablecoin market capitalization and trading volume. As of August 2025, the market capitalization of stablecoins on Ethereum exceeded $137 billion. Furthermore, the accelerated entry of traditional financial institutions and the improvement of regulatory frameworks are driving the expansion of stablecoins into scenarios such as cross-border payments and the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA). The technical principles of stablecoins. The value stability and secure operation of stablecoins rely on underlying technologies such as blockchain and smart contracts. While different types of stablecoins have different technical implementation paths, their core principles all share the principles of "reliable anchoring, transparent mechanisms, and secure transactions." First, there are differences in the technical implementation of different types of stablecoins. Based on their anchoring mechanisms, stablecoins can be categorized into three main types: off-chain asset-collateralized, on-chain asset-collateralized, and algorithmic stablecoins. Off-chain asset-collateralized stablecoins are the most common type of stablecoin, backed by an off-chain reserve of equivalent fiat currency or equivalent assets (such as short-term bonds or gold). The technical implementation primarily involves asset custody, audit verification, and a redemption mechanism. USDT and USDC are representative examples of this type of stablecoin. Secondly, on-chain asset-collateralized stablecoins use over-collateralization of on-chain assets (such as Ether) to support the stablecoin's value. Taking MakerDAO's DAI as an example, users pledge crypto assets such as Ethereum to a smart contract. The system then generates a corresponding amount of stablecoins based on a required collateralization ratio (e.g., 150%). When the value of the collateralized assets drops, causing the collateralization ratio to fall too low, the system automatically triggers a liquidation mechanism, selling some of the collateralized assets to maintain the value of the stablecoin. The purpose of over-collateralization is to mitigate the risks associated with the volatility of on-chain assets. Thirdly, algorithmic stablecoins use an algorithm-driven supply and demand mechanism to support the stablecoin's value. Its core principle is to automatically adjust the supply of stablecoins through smart contracts: when the price exceeds the anchor value, the protocol increases the supply through methods such as additional issuance; when the price falls below the anchor value, the protocol reduces the supply through methods such as buybacks and bond issuance, thereby guiding the price back to its normal value. Secondly, blockchain provides the trust infrastructure for stablecoin operations. ... Stablecoins are typically issued and managed based on smart contracts within a specific blockchain. Transactions involving stablecoins often require the native currency to pay transaction fees on the blockchain. Consensus mechanisms are the core mechanisms of blockchains. Through decentralized consensus, multiple or all nodes can participate in the generation of on-chain data. For example, Ethereum utilizes Proof-of-Stake (PoS), which determines transaction verification authority based on the size of a node's compliant assets and creditworthiness. Tron and Solana employ Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS), where a trusted group of validators is elected through node voting and is responsible for transaction verification and block generation. Because the generation process and results of on-chain data are transparent and traceable, the process can be summarized as "full participation and transparency," earning a high degree of trust from all participants in the blockchain ecosystem. Thirdly, smart contracts serve as the "automated backbone" of stablecoin operations. Smart contracts are automated, executable code deployed on the blockchain that can execute operations such as the issuance, transfer, and destruction of assets according to preset rules. Stablecoin providers use smart contracts to automate the minting and burning functions, ensuring that the stablecoin supply matches the collateralized assets. Smart contracts also manage the locking and liquidation of collateralized assets, triggering liquidation processes promptly during periods of market volatility to mitigate systemic risk. Different types of stablecoins utilize different smart contract applications: in off-chain asset-collateralized stablecoins, smart contracts are primarily used for on-chain issuance, redemption, and audit records; in on-chain asset-collateralized stablecoins, smart contracts handle the core functions of collateral management and risk control; and in algorithmic stablecoins, smart contracts automatically adjust supply based on market price fluctuations to achieve price anchoring. The transparency and multi-center execution of smart contracts not only enhance user trust but also reduce the risk of human manipulation, ensuring secure and efficient stablecoin issuance and management. The Trust Logic of Stablecoins The core competitiveness of stablecoins lies in "trust," meaning users have confidence that they can be exchanged for fiat currency at their anchored price at any time. First, the anchoring and reserve mechanism: The foundation of trust. The three types of stablecoins exhibit different characteristics in terms of the reliability of their anchoring and reserve mechanisms. Off-chain asset-collateralized stablecoins rely on the authenticity and liquidity of their reserve assets, as well as the compliance and transparent audits of their issuers. For example, USDC's reserves are primarily cash and short-term U.S. Treasury bonds, verified monthly by a third party, giving it a relatively high level of trust. Factors such as verification scope, audit frequency, institutional independence, and the proportion of highly liquid assets in reserves are key to risk management for this type of stablecoin. On-chain asset-collateralized stablecoins rely on the dual protections of overcollateralization and automated liquidation. Currencies like DAI set a collateralization ratio of at least 150% to provide a buffer against price fluctuations. Smart contract-driven liquidation mechanisms ensure that when the price of pledged assets reaches the liquidation threshold, an automatically triggered auction process quickly recovers funds. Collateral diversification (to avoid excessive concentration of a single asset), oracle price feed accuracy, and the governance mechanism's emergency response capabilities are key to risk management for this type of stablecoin. The price stabilization mechanisms of algorithmic stablecoins, on the other hand, suffer from structural flaws. Their lack of actual asset collateral makes their stability entirely dependent on the effectiveness of supply and demand algorithms and market arbitrage. Second, the verifiability of technical guarantees: Transparency underpins trust. Technology isn't the sole source of trust, but it provides tools for verifiability and traceability. On the one hand, the transparency of blockchain makes stablecoins' key data traceable, eliminating the need for unilateral statements from issuers. On the other hand, the open-source nature of smart contracts makes their mechanisms and rules auditable. Developers worldwide can collaboratively audit code vulnerabilities and, upon discovery, propose fixes through community governance (for example, DAI optimized its liquidation mechanism through a community vote). This fosters "technical consensus oversight" and reduces the risk of backroom dealings. Furthermore, compliance rules can be embedded in smart contracts, enabling timely oversight of stablecoin activities directly at the contract level. Third, regulatory constraints: Institutional guarantees of trust. If technology and reserves constitute "intrinsic trust," regulation is "external trust supplement." Building trust in stablecoins is inseparable from clear and robust regulatory frameworks. By clarifying rules and reducing market disruptions, users can have greater confidence in the compliance and security of stablecoins. Currently, major jurisdictions around the world are actively exploring ways to bring stablecoins under effective regulation to maintain financial stability, protect user rights, and provide clear regulatory expectations for the healthy development of the market. Whether it's the US GENIUS Act, the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Act (MiCA), or Hong Kong's Stablecoin Regulation, which came into effect on August 1, 2025, all essentially establish a strict regulatory framework covering issuer access, reserve asset management, user rights protection, and comprehensive information disclosure, implementing the principle of "same activities, same risks, same regulation." These regulatory measures not only prevent "illegal operations by issuers" (such as over-issuance and misappropriation of reserves), but also provide an institutional safeguard for user rights, transforming stablecoins from "unregulated innovative attempts" into "compliant financial instruments." Challenges and Outlook Practically speaking, the development of stablecoins faces significant challenges in three areas: regulatory technology, currency stability, and institutional and governance systems. The first is the challenge of regulatory technology. Many stablecoin transactions occur on decentralized platforms or between individual wallets, bypassing compliance procedures such as KYC (Know Your Customer) required in traditional finance. Currently, there is a lack of large-scale regulatory infrastructure for global stablecoins and on-chain transactions. This makes it difficult to track and dispose of funds entering the stablecoin and blockchain ecosystems. This situation effectively facilitates illegal activities such as extortion, money laundering, and fraud. Secondly, there is the challenge of currency stability. For fiat-collateralized stablecoins, their value is heavily dependent on the transparency and regular auditing of reserve assets. However, there have been numerous incidents in the market where opaque reserve information and stablecoin price decoupling have triggered widespread market panic. Thirdly, there are institutional and governance challenges. The global nature of stablecoins creates a sharp conflict with the current state of regulatory fragmentation within each country. The lack of an effective international regulatory coordination mechanism makes it difficult to address the cross-border risks they pose. Furthermore, stablecoins are a completely new concept for most Chinese citizens, making them vulnerable to scams. Therefore, there is an urgent need to strengthen public awareness and risk warnings. Looking ahead, thanks to the expansion of cross-border payment scenarios, the supply of stablecoins is expected to surge from the current hundreds of billions of dollars to trillions of dollars. First,stablecoins are expected to gradually penetrate into areas such as supply chain finance and real estate tokenization, driving their transformation from a single payment tool to mainstream financial infrastructure;Second,the regulatory environment is becoming increasingly mature, and the regulatory frameworks of major economies such as the United States, the European Union, and Hong Kong, China will provide clear compliance guidance for stablecoin issuers, further attracting various institutions to participate in market layout;Third,technological innovation is accelerating breakthroughs, and some solutions that effectively improve the scalability of the underlying network and the privacy protection capabilities that can take into account regulation are expected to be implemented. To address the various challenges facing the development of stablecoins, a multi-dimensional, comprehensive response strategy is necessary: At the regulatory technology level, we should increase R&D investment, promote the development of a regulatory infrastructure for the global blockchain ecosystem, and leverage big data and artificial intelligence technologies to ensure orderly, compliant innovation within the stablecoin ecosystem. We should promote the development of a standardized smart contract development system, introduce AI-driven auditing tools to automate the detection of code vulnerabilities, and integrate regulatory rules into contracts to a greater extent, effectively reducing systemic risks. Regarding enhancing the reliability of anchoring mechanisms and reserve management, by establishing a real-time proof-of-reserve system and engaging independent third-party auditing firms, we can urge issuers to proactively and transparently disclose asset details and operational data, thereby strengthening user trust in stablecoins and fostering market consensus. In terms of systems and governance, we should promote international collaboration, establish consistent regulatory collaboration processes, and reduce cross-border compliance barriers. At the same time, we should strengthen domestic user education, improve the public's digital financial literacy, enhance users' risk awareness, and curb fraud and other illegal and irregular activities.