Stablecoins have the potential to become a new type of infrastructure. The budding stage of infrastructure is an important development opportunity. Issuing offshore RMB stablecoins may be China's first choice for participating in the development of stablecoins.

Coinbase is transforming from being a simple exchange to building a full-stack cryptocurrency ecosystem through the Base chain and The Base application.

Golden Finance launches the 2765th issue of "Golden Morning 8" - a morning report on the cryptocurrency and blockchain industry, providing you with the latest and fastest news on the digital currency and blockchain industry.

“Solo is building a “trusted and anonymous” on-chain identity system based on its original zkHE architecture, which is expected to break the “impossible triangle” that has long plagued Web3.

Golden Finance launches "Golden Web3.0 Daily" to provide you with the latest and fastest MEME, DeFi, DAO, NFT and Metaverse industry news.

Stablecoin, Zhu Jiaming: The deep logic and future prospects of stablecoin Golden Finance, Stablecoin is by no means a "new world": it has existed since ancient times and has kept pace with the times.

Bonk seizes the Launchpad market, and its leading revenue triggers a virtuous cycle of token growth.

Stablecoins are no longer a tool that can be summarized by a unified narrative. Their use varies from person to person and from need to need.

How to choose safe and reliable deposit and withdrawal channels and comprehensively prevent and control risks before, during and after the event is a question that every Web3 investor must think about.

A rare 100 BTC Casascius bar bought in 2012 for $500 was finally redeemed in 2025, now worth over $10 million. The owner kept it sealed for 13 years before transferring the Bitcoin to a digital wallet, making a huge profit while preserving its historical value.

Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, said in response to user comments about Farcaster on the As such, requests are stored in CRDTs; they are intended to achieve eventual consistency on the message set, but trust the timestamp provided by the sender and achieve better scalability this way. The only ‘chain’ Farcaster uses is Ethereum (via Optimism). Ethereum is used ‘for more than just usernames’, it also stores registration information for which accounts are allowed to send messages stored by CRDT nodes. This is crucial for anti-spam; otherwise, everyone would be using it to back up their encrypted hard drives, movies, etc. Having the registry on-chain is the only way to make it (i) not controlled by centralized actors and (ii) resistant to Sybil attacks. Therefore, in order to meet the goals of the Farcaster base network as a robust, neutral tool without ongoing dependence on a single entity, the registry plays a key role. (technically) you could also do this with proof of work, but that would be inefficient and in practice a centralized entity would have too much in front of regular users on their phones/laptops Efficiency advantage. "

According to PANews, Web3 critic Liron Shapira recently published an article on X platform, stating that Farcaster, a Web3 social media platform, superficially promotes blockchain technology but only uses it for username allocation, which is a worse implementation of what DNS and email addresses have already achieved. Shapira added that 99% of the technology they are building is non-blockchain and is an interesting experiment aimed at exploring whether adding more features to RSS can drive new product development. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin responded, saying that individual messages, or 'casts,' are published on the Farcaster chain, making it possible to create an independent client and benefiting from having a state machine not controlled by a single organization. Shapira continued, stating that Farcaster's information is stored in central nodes without using blockchain technology, similar to the backend functionality of many RSS reader applications as 'RSS central nodes.' He believes that promoting Farcaster as a blockchain use case is insincere. Buterin commented that this is worth responding to and has asked the team to verify some information. He previously thought that requests would be stored in a large blockchain, like a simplified version of Filecoin, but in reality, they are stored in CRDTs, which aim to achieve eventual consistency on message sets but trust the timestamps provided by senders for better scalability. The only 'chain' Farcaster uses is Ethereum (through Optimism). Ethereum's purpose is 'not just for usernames,' but also stores registration information for accounts allowed to send messages stored by CRDT nodes. This is crucial for anti-spam; otherwise, everyone would use it to back up their encrypted hard drives, movies, etc. Putting the registry on the chain is the only way to ensure it is not controlled by a centralized entity and has resistance to Sybil attacks. Therefore, the registry plays a key role in meeting Farcaster's underlying network goals of being a robust, neutral tool without ongoing reliance on a single entity. Technically, this could also be achieved with proof of work, but it would be inefficient and, in practice, centralized entities have too many efficiency advantages in front of regular users on mobile phones and laptops.